Paul Krugman just nails it yesterday in his column:

Economic debates rarely end with a T.K.O. But the great policy debate of recent years between Keynesians, who advocate sustaining and, indeed, increasing government spending in a depression, and austerians, who demand immediate spending cuts, comes close -- at least in the world of ideas. At this point, the austerian position has imploded; not only have its predictions about the real world failed completely, but the academic research invoked to support that position has turned out to be riddled with errors, omissions and dubious statistics.

Oh snap! Go Paul...Go Paul...

What, after all, do people want from economic policy? The answer, it turns out, is that it depends on which people you ask -- a point documented in a recent research paper by the political scientists Benjamin Page, Larry Bartels and Jason Seawright. The paper compares the policy preferences of ordinary Americans with those of the very wealthy, and the results are eye-opening.

Thus, the average American is somewhat worried about budget deficits, which is no surprise given the constant barrage of deficit scare stories in the news media, but the wealthy, by a large majority, regard deficits as the most important problem we face. And how should the budget deficit be brought down? The wealthy favor cutting federal spending on health care and Social Security-- that is, "entitlements" -- while the public at large actually wants to see spending on those programs rise.

You get the idea: The austerity agenda looks a lot like a simple expression of upper-class preferences, wrapped in a facade of academic rigor. What the top 1 percent wants becomes what economic science says we must do.

Yup..he got that right...

Join the discussion: Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Email Link to a Friend
Permalink to post: http://www.cslproductions.org/money/talk/archives/001403.shtml
Receive an email whenever this MONEY blog is updated:   Subscribe Here!
Tags: austerians, Great Recession, Keynes, Krugman

Share | |

This post is so important we're re-posting it from our Democracy blog!

Here's a fascinating article from Mother Jones detailing how easy it is to shield your political donations from the other side:

Investigators with California's election watchdog and attorney general's office are hot on the trail of the true source of millions in dark money spent to defeat two hard-fought ballot propositions last fall. The wide-ranging probe has conservatives worried that a network of nonprofit groups used to move secret money around the country could be in for some unwanted exposure.

As the probe progresses, some conservatives are nervous that more details -- such as the identities of actual donors -- could be publicized. "This case has got very, very deep and significant implications," says a conservative lobbyist with knowledge of the investigation. "A lot of folks are going to have their dirty laundry hung out, and it's not going to be pretty. Why would money go through such a circuitous route if not to conceal the donors?"

Egg-zactly!

Join the discussion: Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Email Link to a Friend
Permalink to post: http://www.cslproductions.org/money/talk/archives/001398.shtml
Receive an email whenever this MONEY blog is updated:   Subscribe Here!
Tags: California election law, Citizen United

Share | |

Recent Entries

The 1% Solution.
California's Dark-Money Investigation Is Making Conservatives Sweat
Wealth Inequality in America -- This will blow your mind.
Relax! You'll Be More Productive.
Public airwaves for Wi-Fi.
After A.I.G. pays back the U.S. Treasury, they consider suing us!
Treasury Earns $7.6 Billion From Sale of Last Shares in A.I.G.
United States of Subsidies: As Companies Seek Tax Deals, Governments Pay High Price.
The Myth of Painful Choices.
Stock Market Crash 25 Years Ago Today.
Health Care Reform: The Next Chapter.
Top 1% Got 93% of Income Growth as Rich-Poor Gap Widened last year.
An old, irascible voice still chastising Wall Street.
The Jobs Program that wasn't.
Romney's key economic advisor also predicted DOW 36,000 back in 2000.